Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: Tubes, 4 or against???
-
15th-December-2011, 07:05 PM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 2
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
- Rep Power
- 0
Tubes, 4 or against???
being brought up to respect the art of fly fishing for trout & grayling, i am appauled at the use of tubes for stillwater fishing, it should stay where it belongs and with the species they were targeting, Salmon & sea trout.
Too many new, out of place methods have slipped the net already, so why can't people just accept the original art of fly fishing for fresh water trout and grayling????
-
The Following User Says Thank You to r.jones For This Useful Post:
CudaFly (17th-December-2011)
-
17th-December-2011, 06:46 PM #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Moreton, Wirral, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 276
- Blog Entries
- 8
- Thanks
- 7
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
- Rep Power
- 10
Re: Tubes, 4 or against???
Hi R.Jones
I agree that tubes for trout are a little much. I can understand using them for for Salmon etc. early season however with the weight of rod required for tubes there will be no sport at all.Tight Lines - Steve
http://www.cudafly.co.uk
http://www.cudafly.com
http://www.barracudaguiding.co.uk
Telephone 0151 203 6111



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks