Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Unhappy Tubes, 4 or against???

    being brought up to respect the art of fly fishing for trout & grayling, i am appauled at the use of tubes for stillwater fishing, it should stay where it belongs and with the species they were targeting, Salmon & sea trout.
    Too many new, out of place methods have slipped the net already, so why can't people just accept the original art of fly fishing for fresh water trout and grayling????

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to r.jones For This Useful Post:

    CudaFly (17th-December-2011)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Moreton, Wirral, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Posts
    276
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Tubes, 4 or against???

    Hi R.Jones

    I agree that tubes for trout are a little much. I can understand using them for for Salmon etc. early season however with the weight of rod required for tubes there will be no sport at all.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •